29 April 2024
2 min read
#Taxation, #Superannuation, Funds Management & Financial Services, #Workplace Relations & Safety
Published by:
In a previous article we discussed how the relevant contractor provisions in payroll tax legislation have been interpreted across the nation to deem contractors to be employees for payroll tax purposes unless exemptions apply – and critically the breadth of those provisions. A recent case in the NSW Supreme Court reaffirms what we shared then and elaborates on some of the principles.
In the recent case of Loan Market Group Pty Ltd v Chief Commissioner of State Revenue [2024] NSWSC 390 (Loan Market Group), the NSW Supreme Court held that mortgage brokers were deemed employees under the relevant contractor provisions. The Court also classified a mortgage aggregator as an employer who was liable for payroll tax on commissions paid to mortgage brokers.
The Court held that a relevant contract existed. Payments to the assessed brokers were “for or in relation to the performance of work relating to a relevant contract”, rendering the commissions payable wages that were subject to payroll tax.
Building on our previous discussion, the focus here is on the breadth of the term “services”.
In this case, the Court affirmed that the term “services” has a broad meaning and can include “an act of helpful activity”, “the action of helping or doing work for someone” and an “act of assistance”. By way of example, the mortgage broker’s commitment to undertake work in a particular way was characterised as the performance of a service to the mortgage aggregator, even though it was also the performance of a service to a client for whom a loan was arranged.
The judge expressly stated that the outcome may be seen as harsh given the relevant contractor provisions were originally introduced as anti-avoidance measures and not intended to catch “bona fide independent contractors”. However, the net of what is a relevant contract has been cast very wide by the law makers.
The wide relevant contractor provisions will be applied across many other industries beyond just medical and financial services, where services are provided to independent contractors and by intermediaries. A case involving the gig economy will be heard shortly in NSW.
Entities should carefully consider how payments made to independent contractors under a services agreement will be considered for payroll tax purposes.
We have a wealth of experience acting for taxpayers in defending their payroll tax positions. If you have any questions about this article or need assistance with your payroll taxes, please get in touch with a member of our team below.
Disclaimer
The information in this article is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this article is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future.
Published by:
