17 June 2024
18 min read
#Government, #Construction, Infrastructure & Projects
Published by:
Defects in construction can pose significant challenges both during a project and long after its completion. This issue is particularly important for those involved in government projects due to its impact on public safety, consumer protection, the projects budget and use of public funds, and the overall integrity of the built environment.
To help you understand some of the concepts around construction defects, this article briefly explains the defects liability period, a contractor’s right to remedy defects, maintaining privilege during defect investigations and the common law right to claim damages for defective works. Watch our on-demand seminar for a more detailed discussion on these topics.
The defects liability period (DLP) is a specific timeframe, typically 12 months from the date of practical completion, during which contractors are responsible for rectifying any defects that arise. This period is often shorter in relation to contracts for civil works. This allows the contractor an opportunity to repair defects which may not have been apparent before completion without the principal having to resort to dispute resolution. Having the contractor handle the repairs is usually cheaper and more efficient than the principal organising for a third party perform the repairs.
A defects liability clause will require the contractor to repair or make good defects which are, generally, the result of the contractor’s default. Ultimately, this will come down to the drafting of the clause. Some contracts may require the contractor to remedy defects irrespective of the cause, with appropriate reimbursement if the contractor is not at fault.
Determining whether the contractor has an exclusive right to remedy defects during the DLP is important. If the contractor holds this exclusive right, a principal could be in breach of the contract if they engage another contractor to remedy the works without offering the contractor the opportunity to do so first.
A principal may also have the right to recourse to the security under the contract. In Queensland, the applicability of section 67J of the Queensland Building and Construction Commission Act 1991 (Qld) (QBCC Act) must be considered for any such recourse, noting that if the work qualifies as “building work” under the QBCC Act, the principal or head contractor may only have recourse to the security if:
Work performed for the State or an instrumentality or agency of the State by an independent contractor is not excluded from the ambit of “building work” under the QBCC Act.
Australian courts appear to favour an approach that places a heavy burden on the principal or head contractor to comply with contract procedures for notifying identified defects and allowing the contractor to rectify those defects. Failure to do so could substantially reduce the damages that the owner or principal can recover.
Despite provisions concerning defects in the contract a contractor can, in some instances, still be liable for damages for defective work through a claim for breach of contract.
In Turner Corporation Ltd (Receiver and Manager Appointed) v Austotel Pty Ltd (Unreported Judgement, Supreme Court of New South Wales, Cole J, 55093 of 1993, 2 June 1994), the NSW Supreme Court considered a standard form building contract with provisions concerning defects. The Court held that there was an established code which defined the rights, obligations and liabilities of the parties and the mechanisms for achieving practical completion and addressing defects during the DLP.
Although the contract did not expressly state that either party agreed to waive their common law rights in relation to defects, the Court held that there was no room for damages at common law because the parties had, by contract, agreed on the consequences for the proprietor and the contractor in the event of a breach regarding defective building works.
The extent to which a contract excludes the common law right to damages for breach of contract concerning defective works depends on the contract terms.
During or after a construction project a defect in the works may become apparent. When the cause or impact of the defect is unclear, engaging an expert to investigate may be necessary.
Depending on the nature of the defect, you may require multiple experts who specialise in the specific type of defect and can assess the cost to rectify that defect. It is important to ensure these experts are suitably qualified to provide their opinions on the defect.
The process of engaging experts can be lengthy and may require searching for the expertise beyond Australia.
If you plan to rely on your expert to support a legal case, it is worth investing early in an independent expert who typically carry more credibility than a consultant involved in the original construction work or design.
It is often practical to instruct your solicitors to engage your expert, manage any written communication and ensure that legal privilege applies where possible.
If expert opinion is sought to settle a dispute, it and any related communications may be subject to ‘without prejudice’ privilege. This principle safeguards documents from being relied upon by the other party to your detriment. Therefore, all documents should be marked as ‘without prejudice’ where possible.
Expert reports obtained for settlement negotiations are generally considered to be ‘without prejudice’ and are not disclosable outside of that setting. However, their confidentiality can be challenged if the link to settlement is not properly established.
If litigation is anticipated, communications with experts can be subject to legal professional privilege if they are confidential and primarily intended for the purposes of seeking legal advice for actual or anticipated litigation. However, once an expert report is finalised and exchanged between the parties, previously privileged documents, such as the instruction letter or brief sent to the expert, are no longer privileged.
In Queensland, expert statements or reports are not privileged from disclosure. To minimise your disclosure obligations, you could:
To maintain privilege, label all correspondence with the expert as confidential and privileged. If a document is not treated as confidential and privileged, privilege will likely be waived.
Latent defects are defects that are hidden or not apparent until long after a project’s completion. Disputes between parties during this phase can become complex and serious.
Beyond merely considering the potential causes of action to recover this loss, the party who suffers the loss must consider limitation periods, proportionate liability and statutory defences. We consider each of these in our previous article on hurdles to recovering loss for latent defects in construction projects.
This article underscores the critical aspects of construction defects and liability management. Firstly, the DLP typically 12 months post-practical completion, obligates contractors to rectify defects. This period facilitates efficient and cost-effective defect resolution without formal disputes, emphasising contractual obligations that may require contractors to remedy defects regardless of fault. Concurrently, contractors often hold an exclusive right during this period to rectify defects, compelling principals to adhere strictly to contract terms before engaging other parties.
Secondly, legal considerations highlight common law rights where contractors may face liability for defective work despite contract provisions. Expert involvement is pivotal in defect investigations, safeguarded by legal privilege, crucial for protecting communications and documents marked 'without prejudice.'
Authors: Kirsty Smith & Sally Crane
All change: Government adopts long list of reforms for corruption watchdog
The former chief justice Catherine Holmes has recommended sixteen reforms relating the performance of the functions of the Crime and Corruption Commission. The Queensland government intends to adopt all sixteen recommendations of the independent review (29 May 2024). More…
Farmers lead class action against Queensland power generators
Queensland farmers are leading a class action against two major government-owned power generators, that being CS Energy and Stanwell. The class action is in relation to Queenslanders who are purported to have paid inflated electricity prices between 2013 and 2019. The matter currently before the Federal Court and is expected to last about eight weeks (05 June 2024). More…
$60 million SES budget to enhance local emergency services
The Miles government has increased support for State Emergency Services as part of its new budget. $3.8 million has been allocated for SES equipment and flood boats. More than $20 million of the $60 million has been allocated to enhance operation capability and support for frontline volunteers (11 June 2024). More…
Budget brings water security and renewable energy to Central Queensland
Of the $2.3 million that has been allocated to infrastructure, $266.3 million is to be invested in major renewable energy projects throughout the region. In addition, $873 million has been allocated to Central Queensland Hospital and Health Services. (11 June 2024). More…
State Budget will help us build more homes – but later rather than sooner
The $107 billion that has been dedicated to ensuring Queensland delivers the biggest decade of infrastructure investment will place more pressure on an industry already struggling to deliver. Given the current struggle, there will also be an increase in the costs of construction due to trade shortages and failing productivity (11 June 2024). More…
QLD Budget shows why State Government policy settings must change to protect future investment and jobs
“Six months ago, the Government forecast coal royalties would reach $9.2 billion this financial year but that figure has now soared to $10.5 billion. Overall, the resources sector contributed 14 per cent of all State Government revenue, which is more than any other industry… The best way for the Queensland Government to secure a long-term royalties stream that benefits everyday Queenslanders, is to get the right policy settings, including a fairer royalty system, that will encourage investment in new projects, and secure the jobs that come with it” stated QRC Chief Executive Officer, Janette Hewson (11 June 2024). More…
Amendments introduced to strengthen operation of blue card laws
New reforms have been introduced to update working with children laws in order to support the operation of the blue card system. The introduction of these changes would bring about an end to kinship carers needing to hold a blue card when caring for kin. In addition, the Bill expands who is required to hold a blue card to encompass those who deliver part, entertainment, beauty and photography services that involve children (14 June 2024). More…
Labour Force, May 2024
The Queensland Government Statistician’s Office has issued its report on the labour force for Queensland and Australia. The report outlines monthly trends in employment, labour supply, the participate rate and the unemployment rate. May saw an increase to employment in Queensland by 0.4% for the month of May. Read the results here.
Population growth, Queensland, December quarter 2023
Queensland has seen an increase of 141,378 to its population over the 12 months to 31 December 2023. This puts the population growth rate above the national average, sitting at 2.5% for the period. Read the results here.
Queensland’s regions 2023
Queensland has the most people who live outside the greater capital city area of Brisbane. The Queensland Government will implement a new regional governance model to improve how entities work together as, previously, regional growth functions have been shifted between departments at a rate that has caused constant disruptions which have put strategic initiatives and project delivery at risk. Read the results here.
Education 2023
The report by the Queensland Audit Office shows that entities in Queensland’s education sector need to improve their systems and processes, especially when considering the risk of cyber attacks. In addition, Universities are facing financial challenges with most continuing to make a loss throughout 2023. TAFE Queensland is also expected to continue to financially deteriorate. The departments have also not met their budgeted capital spend. Read the results here.
State entities 2023
The report makes note of three areas of importance. The first outlines that the main contributing factor to royalty revenue was for coal and oil. The second noted that entities are not managing security risks posed by third-party provider arrangements. The third area spoke of the culture of the Queensland public sector. Read the results here.
Responding to and recovering from cyber attacks
As it stands, public sector entities are not as prepared as they need to be in relation to cyber-attacks. Of note, the report found that whilst entities rely heavily on third parties to deal with responses to cyber-attacks, none of these entities had tested how these third parties would perform in a crisis. Read the results here.
Supreme Court of Queensland Practice Direction Number 16 of 2024
The Supreme Court of Queensland has issued a practice direction in relation to Protected Counselling Communications. Read more here.
QLS releases Guidance Statement on AI
The Queensland Law Society’s guidance statement outlines the ethical obligations that solicitors need to consider when using AI in the legal profession Read more here.
AAT Bulletin Issue No. 9/2024 6 May 2024
The AAT Bulletin is a fortnightly publication containing information about recently published decisions and appeals against decisions in the AAT’s General, Freedom of Information, National Disability Insurance Scheme, Security, Small Business Taxation, Taxation & Commercial and Veterans’ Appeals Divisions. Read more here.
AAT Bulletin Issue No. 10/2024 20 May 2024
The AAT Bulletin is a fortnightly publication containing information about recently published decisions and appeals against decisions in the AAT’s General, Freedom of Information, National Disability Insurance Scheme, Security, Small Business Taxation, Taxation & Commercial and Veterans’ Appeals Divisions. Read more here.
AAT Bulletin Issue No. 11/2024 2 June 2024
The AAT Bulletin is a fortnightly publication containing information about recently published decisions and appeals against decisions in the AAT’s General, Freedom of Information, National Disability Insurance Scheme, Security, Small Business Taxation, Taxation & Commercial and Veterans’ Appeals Divisions. Read more here.
Breakwater Pacific Pty Ltd v Chief Executive, Department of Resources [2024] QSC 107
ADMINISTRATIVE LAW – JUDICIAL REVIEW – REVIEWABLE DECISION – UNDER AN ENACTMENT – where the applicant applied to surrender a lease – where the respondent made a decision refusing the application – where the applicant seeks judicial review of the decision – whether the decision made by the respondent was made under an enactment for the purpose of the Judicial Review Act 1991 (Qld)
Health Ombudsman v Kumar [2024] QCAT 132
PROFESSIONS AND TRADES – HEALTH CARE PROFESSIONALS – MEDICAL PRACTITIONERS – DISCIPLINARY PROCEEDINGS – PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT AND UNPROFESSIONAL CONDUCT – GENERALLY – where disciplinary proceedings commenced against general practitioner – where multiple allegations of inappropriate conduct – where the respondent is a wholly deceitful and unreliable witness – professional misconduct established
Pavlou v Brisbane City Council [2024] QDC 73
HUMAN RIGHTS – whether s 21 of the Human Rights Act 2019 (Qld) applied – whether the Local Law reasonably limited such rights under s 13 of the Human Rights Act 2019 (Qld)
Bills introduced
Government
Assisted Reproductive Technology Bill 2024
Criminal Justice Legislation (Sexual Violence and Other Matters) Amendment Bill 2024
Electrical Safety and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2024
Progressive Coal Royalties Protection (Keep Them in the Bank) Bill 2024
Private member
Crocodile Control and Conservation Bill 2024
Bills passed without amendment
Cheaper Power (Supplementary Appropriation) Act 2024
Bills amended during passage
Brisbane Olympic and Paralympic Games Arrangements Amendment Bill 2024
Corrective Services (Promoting Safety) and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2024
Manufactured Homes (Residential Parks) Amendment Bill 2024
Police Powers and Responsibilities and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2024
Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation and Other Legislation Amendment Bill 2024
Acts assented to
Brisbane Olympic and Paralympic Games Arrangements Amendment Act 2024 No. 29 – Assent 6 June 2024
Cheaper Power (Supplementary Appropriation) Act 2024 No. 26 - Assent 6 June 2024
Manufactured Homes (Residential Parks) Amendment Act 2024
Police Powers and Responsibilities and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2024 No. 24
Residential Tenancies and Rooming Accommodation and Other Legislation Amendment Act 2024 No. 27
Proclamations commencing Acts made
Proclamation – Forensic Science Queensland Act 2024 (commencing remaining provisions)
Proclamation – Emergency Services Reform Amendment Act 2024 (commencing remaining provisions)
Proclamation – Marine Rescue Queensland Act 2024 (commencing remaining provisions)
Proclamation – State Emergency Service Act 2024 (commencing remaining provisions)
Subordinate legislation notified
Petroleum and Gas (General Provisions) (Annual Fee) Amendment Regulation 2024
Energy (Renewable Transformation and Jobs) Regulation 2024
Justice Legislation (Allowances and Other Matters) Amendment Regulation 2024
Proclamation – Forensic Science Queensland Act 2024 (commencing remaining provisions)
Criminal Practice (Interpreters) and Other Rules Amendment Rule 2024
Criminal Practice Amendment Rule 2024
Major Events (Motor Racing Events) (Townsville 500) Amendment Regulation 2024
Proclamation – Emergency Services Reform Amendment Act 2024 (commencing remaining provisions)
Proclamation – Marine Rescue Queensland Act 2024 (commencing remaining provisions)
Proclamation – State Emergency Service Act 2024 (commencing remaining provisions)
Transport Legislation (Fees) Amendment Regulation 2024
Subordinate legislation tabled
Fisheries (Structural Reform Stage 2) and Other Legislation Amendment Regulation 2024
Penalties and Sentences (Penalty Unit Value) Amendment Regulation 2024
Subordinate legislation repealed
Marine Parks (Great Sandy) Zoning Plan 2017
Subordinate legislation expired
Disclaimer
The information in this article is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this article is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future.
Published by:
