20 February 2024
3 min read
#Government, #Workplace Relations & Safety
Published by:
The origins of the positive duty to prevent sexual harassment (as contained within the Sex Discrimination Act 1984) are found in the Respect@Work national inquiry conducted by the then Sex Discrimination Commissioner, Kate Jenkins. A copy of the report of this inquiry, which provides very useful background and its recommendations, can found on the Australian Human Rights Commission (AHRC) website.
The positive duty requires that employers eliminate, as far as possible, the following behaviour from occurring:
The new positive duty represents a paradigm shift as it requires that proactive action be taken to prevent sexual harassment occurring, rather than purely reactive measures, such as complaint mechanisms and punitive measures in respect of perpetrators being relied on. The proactive duty also makes it clear that sexual harassment is a work, health and safety issue, as well as a conduct issue.
Fulfilling the positive duty entails implementing “reasonable and proportionate” measures to achieve the outcomes above, but what is considered reasonable will vary according to the employer’s size and resources. Given factors such as workplace culture and workforce demographics vary between employers, a ‘one size fits all’ approach is unlikely to be effective.
The AHRC recommends using the following four ‘guiding principles’ as touchstones in developing measures to ensure that the positive duty is satisfied:
In our view, these guiding principles provide a very useful starting point for any employer in reviewing their current measures and considering what changes may be necessary to ensure that it is doing all that is “reasonable and proportionate” to fulfil their positive duty to prevent workplace sexual harassment.
If you have any questions about this article or need assistance with reviewing your current workplace policies, please get in touch with our team below.
Disclaimer
The information in this article is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this article is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future.
Published by: