13 February 2024
2 min read
#Data & Privacy, #Corporate & Commercial Law
Published by:
Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) recently imposed a $302,500 penalty on Outdoor Supacentre Pty Ltd (Outdoor Supacentre), a four-wheel drive and camping accessory retailer, for sending over 83,000 marketing text messages in breach of the Spam Act 2003 (Cth) (Spam Act).
The Spam Act requires organisations to have the recipient’s consent to send marketing materials and each communication must include a functional unsubscribe option.
In this case, consumers complained over a period of more than 10 months that Outdoor Supacentre sent text messages without a functional unsubscribe option and continued to send marketing messages after they had withdrawn consent to receive such communications. It was after these complaints that the ACMA initiated an investigation.
Outdoor Supacentre submitted to the ACMA that the marketing messages had been sent by mistake, blaming the delivery of messages on a previous data migration between service providers. However, it did not provide evidence of any quality assurance processes or compliance checks undertaken to prevent the marketing text messages from being sent.
The ACMA was not satisfied that they made a mistake of fact.
In addition to the fine, the ACMA also accepted a three-year court-enforceable undertaking from Outdoor Supacentre, committing it to appoint an independent consultant to review its compliance with Spam rules.
While the Spam Act has been around for quite a while, organisations should not be complacent about their marketing communications. The ACMA are consistently active in investigating breaches and taking action.
Businesses can take the following steps to prevent breaching spam laws:
If you have any questions regarding your business’ obligations under the Spam Act or require assistance with reviewing your data and privacy policies, please get in touch with our team below.
Disclaimer
The information in this publication is of a general nature and is not intended to address the circumstances of any particular individual or entity. Although we endeavour to provide accurate and timely information, we do not guarantee that the information in this article is accurate at the date it is received or that it will continue to be accurate in the future.
Published by: